Visit The Alliance Homepage

*
*
*
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 02:09:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
20818 Posts in 2393 Topics by 1352 Members Latest Member: - craggster37 Most online today: 19 - most online ever: 281 (July 08, 2008, 08:04:09 PM)

Home » Blog Index » Respectful Uncertainties of a Pharmacophile  » Nonce-sense about opiates Want your own blog?

Nonce-sense about opiates

Written by physeptomaton on February 04, 2012, 03:47:14 AM
Digg itAdd to Del.icio.usFurl itStumble itAdd to Technorati
share

Print article
options
http://www.insidetime.org/mailbag.asp?a=677&c=manipulation_of_prescription_drugs

The prisoners' monthly for February features a letter from Bure, a low-level nonce prison by someone too cowardly to divulge their name. Bear in mind murderers and Category A nonces comment with real names in the "mailbag". He is claiming that re-offending rates are linked to the problem of "manipulating" prescription drugs, namely strong opioids. He speaks of Albany being the other prison at which this is happening. And could one hazard a guess at what kind of prisoner is to be found, almost exclusively, on that third of the Isle penal estate? That's right. Not Of Normal Criminal Element. Much worse ones than Bure as well, at least in the eyes of the Sentencing Guidelines Council and some risk assessors. The monstrous Colin Blanchard- who masterminded the Westcountry nursery ring from five hours up the M5/M6/M62- was one of them, although his crime and sentence qualified him for Wakefield. It is probably the non-physical nature of his direct involvement that spared him such a fate.

So let's get this straight. He is saying that opiates make it more likely a nonce will strike again. WHAT? Not in my experience. Opiates are generally used by the victims of fiddlers, not the fiddlers themselves. Anything that lowers self control is not good when trying to suppress wrong urges, but alcohol or benzodiazepines are far more likely to do this. From the vindictive perspective, it could be used to justify not prescribing pain relief to injured nonces on the out, leaving them to suffer.
2 Comments

The nonce from BURE needs his head seen to, ive got the arguement but im not intrested in even thinking about writing about it because personally id like to push the plunger down on any nonce,pity really he didnt get paralised in his car accident ten years ago.All NONCES should be given an injection and then they wont have to worry about people in the meds line going on about how much they have lifted in the gym.They should give them an injection in reception and then throw them in a skip out thee back.All the best Froude.


Has'nt inside time got better with the years ,i can remember reading an old black and white paper lol.Cheers Froude
Written by froudeon February 04, 2012, 06:38:27 AM
froude, IT has definitely got better. I support the death penalty for some murder, but probably not for nonces, because they haven't killed someone and the victim can heal even if they don't always. I said when I was writing about "The boy no one loved"- Casey Watson that the heroin dealer who nonced his client's 5 year old son deserved death but that was more from a street code of honour perspective i.e. because he was a dealer than because of what he did, there are far worse nonces in the scheme of things than him. When I hear of a really serious case, like the one in Northampton C********** family I have PM'd you about with 6 abusers in the same family, it makes me think of hanging em or giving them 3 months worth of concentrated largactil IM in the gluteal muscle at once, but on reflection I can't bring myself to see it as justice at least within the moral law.

Casey's new one was out this week "Crying for help"- I was relieved about that one. I thought from the cover thing about a 12 year old with a "dark secret past" who looked 18 and misbehaved in school that she had been fiddled by a prostitution ring who could make clients believe she was 16 or older, possibly sold into it by her own mum and dad. In fact there was only a small bit about sex abuse with not much evidence, most of it was a serious illness (Addisons Disease) and mental problems that came from not having a mum and the grandparents emotionally abusing her by blaming her.

"Little prisoners", the next one- different story. It says a 9 and 6 year old were "touching each other intimately". Now that's not always related to being a victim of an adult abuser, it can be in a dysfunctional family where there is not enough affection or emotional/physical abuse only the siblings feel a need for love but don't know how to express it appropriately so it becomes sexualised. If they are both before puberty though, the siblings in such a family will usually have got their sexualised behaviour from somewhere unhealthy though. I think this is going to be a multi victim multi offender (M V M O) like the one in Kent, two brothers abused one of the brothers' three daughters and two of their nieces. The father of the 3 girls was also convicted of forcing or enticing his son to have sex with his sister. A stepmum got 8 years for holding one of the girls down during a rape but was acquitted on appeal, and the children disclosed other women and men had abused them including another stepmum and their dad's friends but there was not enough evidence to convict. I probably believe the children.
Written by physeptomatonon February 04, 2012, 02:05:25 PM

Most Recent
Nonce-sense about opiates
My schoolie days
Intolerance of the allegedly intolerant by the confirmedly intolerant
Extension du domaine de la lutte- why so many people abuse drugs/alcohol?
My code of honour continued
What is my code of honour precisely?
From my personal journal- Late summer 2011, in the capital

Archive
February 2012 (1)
January 2012 (2)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (1)
October 2011 (1)

RSS 2.0 Feed
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.101 seconds with 41 queries.